Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 3;32(3):166–172. doi: 10.1177/1971400919842059

Table 2.

Demographic, clinical, imaging and procedural characteristics of patients.

Patient no. Decade of life Site of aneurysm Aneurysm largest diameter size (mm) Treatment Time from RIPC to EVT (minutes) Time from EVT to postoperative MRI (hours) Complication No. of DWI positive lesions Volume of DWI lesions (mm3)
1 6th Vertebrobasilar junction 14.7 Flow diversion 61 31.25 Abdominal pain due to retroperitoneal hematomaa 6 302.34
2 6th Left paraclinoid ICA 16 Flow diversion and coiling 279 22.35 3 18.29
3 7th Vertebrobasilar junction 6.5 Coiling 180 28 Petechiae on upper right arm and at anterior cubital
4 7th Right MCA aneurysm 5.3 Coiling 265 24.26 Coil migration without neurological sequelae
5 6th Right paraclinoid ICA 13 Coiling 156 43.65 Small petechiae on right upper arm
6 6th Left ICA 5 Flow diversion 76 24.86 Thrombosis of PED device, recanalized with Reopro infusion 8 188.59
7 7th Left MCA 7.2 Coiling 185 30.37 2 520.18

EVT: endovascular treatment; ICA: internal carotid artery; MCA: middle cerebral artery; PED: pipeline embolization device.

a

The patient developed abdominal pain and was revealed to have a retroperitoneal hematoma on computed tomography imaging. Serial hemoglobin levels were followed and remained stable. The patient’s abdominal pain improved, and she was discharged the following day.