Skip to main content
. 2019 May 9;137(7):775–785. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.1063

Table 2. Systematic Reviews Addressing the Management of Corneal Diseases, by Reliability Status.

Variable No. (%)
Systematic Reviews Classified as Unreliable (n = 33) Systematic Reviews Classified as Reliable (n = 65)
Year of publication
1997-1999 1 (3) 1 (2)
2000-2002 0 0
2003-2005 1 (3) 3 (5)
2006-2008 0 4 (6)
2009-2011 3 (9) 7 (11)
2012-2014 16 (48) 24 (37)
2015-2017 12 (36) 26 (40)
Diseases addressed in the systematic reviewa
Bacterial keratitisb 0 3 (5)
Blepharitisb 0 4 (6)
Conjunctivitisb 4 (12) 21 (32)
Corneal ectasiab 3 (9) 5 (8)
Corneal edema and opacificationb 1 (3) 3 (5)
Dry eye syndromeb 12 (36) 10 (15)
Other (nonbacterial) keratitis 1 (3) 4 (6)
Hordeolum 0 2 (3)
Pterygium 2 (6) 4 (6)
Keratoconus 5 (15) 7 (11)
Chalazion 1 (3) 0 (0)
Blepharospasm 1 (3) 0 (0)
Corneal injury 3 (9) 5 (8)
Corneal abrasion 0 5 (8)
Patients undergoing keratoplasty, corneal transplant, or LASIK 0 3 (5)
Types of management addressed in the systematic reviewa
Medication 13 (39) 44 (68)
Device 4 (12) 9 (14)
Surgery 15 (45) 18 (28)
Other procedure 1 (3) 0 (0)
Supplements, including artificial tears 10 (30) 9 (14)
Acupuncture 1 (3) 2 (3)
Other 1 (3) 2 (3)
Types of study designs included in the systematic reviewa
Randomized clinical trials 22 (67) 58 (89)
Non–randomized clinical trials 5 (15) 6 (9)
Cohort studies 7 (21) 6 (9)
Case-control studies 0 1 (2)
Cross-sectional studies 0 0
Case series or case reports 5 (15) 2 (3)
Other 1 (3) 2 (3)
Included a quantitative synthesis (ie, meta-analysis)
Yes 17 (52) 41 (63)
No 16 (48) 18 (28)
Not applicable because the systematic review included <2 studies 0 6 (9)
Cochrane review
Yes 0 26 (40)
No 33 (100) 39 (60)
No. of authors
1 2 (6) 3 (5)
2-4 18 (55) 32 (49)
5-7 9 (27) 22 (34)
>7 4 (12) 8 (12)
Funding sources for systematic reviewa
Government 6 (18) 31 (48)
Pharmaceutical/other industry 4 (12) 3 (5)
Foundation 4 (12) 7 (11)
Academic institution or department 4 (12) 6 (9)
Other funding source 0 1 (2)
Explicitly stated as none 5 (15) 3 (5)
Not reported 15 (45) 24 (37)
Author financial relationshipsa
Board membership 2 (6) 2 (3)
Consultancy 4 (12) 5 (8)
Employment 2 (6) 1 (2)
Expert testimony 0 0
Gifts 0 0
Grants/grants pending 4 (12) 3 (5)
Payment for lectures/speaking 4 (12) 2 (3)
Payment for manuscript preparation 0 0
Patents (planned, pending, or issued) 0 0
Royalties 3 (9) 0
Presentations 0 0
Stock/stock options 1 (3) 0
Travel/accommodations/meeting expenses 0 0
Other 0 2 (3)
Explicitly stated as none 15 (45) 41 (63)
Not reported 13 (39) 14 (22)
a

More than 1 category could apply to a systematic review.

b

Addressed in most recent American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Patterns (PPPs) on corneal disease.