Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 30;6(21):7561–7573. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2153

Table 2.

(A) Summary of one‐way ANOVAs to test gene pool effects on α *p. When a nonparametric test was used, it is shown by the symbol. (B) Post hoc comparisons among gene pools adjusted by Tukey's HSD for Pinus nigra and Pinus pinaster. Different letters indicate differences among gene pools

(A)
Species Parameter F/K P‐value
Pinus sylvestris α 1p 0.60 n.s.
α 2p 0.57 n.s.
α 3p 0.57 n.s.
Pinus nigra α 1p 6.95 **
α 2p 7.20 n.s.
α 3p 2.53 n.s.
Pinus pinaster α 1p 12.43 ***
α 2p 14.23 n.s.
α 3p 3.84 n.s.
Pinus halepensis α 1p 1.07 n.s.
α 2p 0.44 n.s.
α 3p 0.08 n.s.
(B)
Species Gene pools α 1p SD
Pinus nigra spp. laricio 4.15 0.04 a
spp. salzmannii 4.12 0.01 ab
spp. dalmatica 4.08 a ab
spp. nigra 4.06 0.02 b
Pinus pinaster Morocco 3.11 0.00 a
Atlantic Iberian 3.10 0.02 a
Eastern Spain 3.06 0.03 ab
Southern Spain 3.06 0.05 abc
Corsica 3.05 0.00 abc
Central Spain 3.02 0.03 bc
Italy 2.95 a cd
Eastern North Africa 2.91 0.00 d
a

Only one datum, standard deviation was not estimated.