Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 2;2018(6):CD010784. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010784.pub2
Methods Study design: parallel‐group randomised controlled trial.
Setting: not specified/Egypt.
Dates: not specified.
Participants Inclusion criteria: unilateral, single, radio‐opaque distal ureteral stones < 10 mm in size.
Exclusion criteria: not available.
Diagnostic criteria: not available.
Total number of participants randomly assigned: 90.
Group A (silodosin)
  • Number of participants randomly assigned: 30.

  • Age (median): not specified.

  • Gender (M/F): not specified.


Group B (tamsulosin)
  • Number of participants randomly assigned: 30.

  • Age (median): not specified.

  • Gender (M/F): not specified.


Group C (placebo)
  • Number of participants randomly assigned: 30

  • Age (median): not specified

  • Gender (M/F): not specified

Interventions Group A (n = 30): 8 mg silodosin daily.
Group B (n = 30): 0.4 mg tamsulosin daily.
Group C (n = 30): not given any of the above medications.
Co‐interventions: not specified.
Outcomes Stone clearance
  • How measured: not specified.

  • Time points measured: not reported.

  • Time points reported: not reported.

  • Subgroup: none.


Complications
  • How measured: during the surgical procedure direct visualisation.

  • Time points measured: at the time of surgery.

  • Time points reported: not reported.

  • Subgroup: none.

Notes Funding Sources: none.
Declaration of interests: none declared.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote from publication: "Patients were randomised into three groups...."
Not described.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes Low risk Quote from publication: "placebo‐controlled study".
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Subjective outcomes Low risk Quote from publication: "placebo‐controlled study".
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Objective outcomes Low risk Objective outcomes are not likely to be influenced by lack of blinding.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Stone free rate High risk The number of participants in the analysis were not reported.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Serious adverse events or complications of treatment High risk The number of participants in the analysis were not reported.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Secondary procedures Unclear risk No information given.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Hospital stay Unclear risk No information given.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Pain Unclear risk No information given.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Study outcomes were not specified.
Other bias Unclear risk Abstract only.