Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 2;2018(6):CD010784. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010784.pub2
Methods Study design: parallel‐group randomised controlled trial.
Setting: number of centres not specified/Egypt.
Dates when study was conducted: April 2011 to April 2016.
Participants Inclusion criteria: children < 15 years old with a renal stones (1‐2) cm in a solitary kidney.
Exclusion criteria: not available.
Diagnostic criteria: not available.
Total number of participants randomly assigned: 22.
Group A (SWL)
  • Number of participants randomly assigned: 11.

  • Age (median): 9.6.

  • Gender (M/F): not available.


Group B (Flexible URS)
  • Number of participants randomly assigned: 11.

  • Age (median): 9.3.

  • Gender (M/F): not available.

Interventions Group A (n = 11): not available.
Group B (n = 11): a 7.5 Fr flexible ureteroscope (FURS) was introduced into the ureter over a hydrophilic guidewire under visual and fluoroscopic guidance without access sheath. Complete stone dusting using 200 mm laser fibre (0.2 ‐ 1.0 joules power and 15 ‐ 30 Hz frequency) was done in all cases ended with a 5 Fr JJ stent insertion.
Co‐interventions: JJ stent.
Outcomes Stone clearance
  • How measured: not specified.

  • Time points measured: not reported.

  • Time points reported: not reported.

  • Subgroup: none.


Complications
  • How measured: during the surgical procedure direct visualisation.

  • Time points measured: at the time of surgery.

  • Time points reported: not reported.

  • Subgroup: none.


Secondary procedures
  • How measured: not specified.

  • Time points measured: not specified.

  • Time points reported: not reported.

  • Subgroup: none.

Notes Funding sources: none.
Declaration of interests: none declared.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Not described.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Subjective outcomes Unclear risk Not described.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Objective outcomes Low risk Objective outcomes are not likely to be influenced by lack of blinding.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Stone free rate Unclear risk The number of randomised participant was not reported.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Serious adverse events or complications of treatment Unclear risk The number of randomised participant was not reported.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Secondary procedures Unclear risk The number of randomised participant was not reported.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Hospital stay Unclear risk The number of randomised participant was not reported.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Pain Unclear risk No information given.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Study outcomes were not specified.
Other bias Unclear risk Abstract only.