Duerksen 2004.
| Methods | Design: retrospective case series Aim: to determine whether a subgroup of participants with intestinal obstruction would benefit from support with PN. Patients receiving PN at home and in hospital included in study, only HPN patients included in this review. Country: Canada Funding: not reported |
|
| Participants | Number: 5 Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: not reported Age: mean 44.6 years (37 to 57) Gender: 2 female and 3 male Cancer site: (n)
Patient in MBO: 100% Performance status: median Karnofsky performance status 60 (50 to 70) Treatment received: chemotherapy 3 |
|
| Interventions | HPN given to all participants. No information was given about nutritional support aims or composition of PN solutions. | |
| Outcomes |
|
|
| Notes | ||
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | High risk | No randomisation |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | No group allocation concealment |
| Criteria for assignment to treatments | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
| Comparability of treatment groups | Unclear risk | Only one treatment group |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | No blinding |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | No blinding |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk |
|
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
| Other bias | Low risk | The study appears to be free of other sources of bias |