Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 10;2018(9):CD007287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007287.pub4

9. Definitions and results of humoral response evaluation in other antigen‐specific immunotherapy studies.

Study N Target antigen(s) Analysed Assay Positive if: % positive
Antonilli 2016 10 MUC1 ± ErbB1 ± CEA no      
Berinstein 2012 6 topoisomerase IIα, integrin β8 subunit precursor, ABI‐binding protein C3, TACE/ADAM17, junction plakglobin, EDDR1, BAP31 no      
Berinstein 2013 19 survivin no      
Brossart 2000 3 Her‐2/Neu, MUC1 no      
Chianese‐Bullock 2008 9 FBP, Her‐2/Neu, MAGE‐A1 no      
Chu 2012 11 Her‐2/Neu, hTERT, PADRE no      
Diefenbach 2008 6 NY‐ESO‐1 yes unknown unknown not reported
Dijkgraaf 2015 6 p53 no      
Dhodapkar 2012 9 NY‐ESO‐1 yes ELISA > 100 0%
Freedman 1998 21 CEA yes ELISA ≥ 2× pretreatment and > mean + 2 SD of 10 normal sera 0%
Galanis 2010 63 MUC1 yes unknown unknown 0%
Goh 2013 6 CYP1B1 no      
Gray 2016 56 MUC1 yes ELISA unknown No response measured
Gribben 2005 3 CEA, MUC1 no      
Gulley 2008 30 Sialyl‐Tn no      
Imhof 2013 15 TERT, survivin no      
Kaumaya 2009 5 Her‐2/Neu yes ELISA high response: > 0.6
intermediate response: 0.2 to 0.6
60% high responses, 40% intermediate responses
Kawano 2014 42 personalised (max 4 out of 31 vacinne candidates) yes Luminex assay 1 out of 4 vaccine‐specific IgG titers is 2‐fold higher than pre‐vaccination 6 vaccinations: 16/42
12 vaccinations: 29/30
Kobayashi 2014 56 WT1 ± MUC1 ± CA‐125 no      
Le 2012 2 mesothelin no      
Leffers 2009a 20 p53 yes unknown unknown pre‐imm: 40%, post‐imm: 45%
Lennerz 2014 7 survivin no      
Letsch 2011 8 WT1 no      
MacLean 1996 10 Thomsen Friedenreich yes ELISA unknown 80% IgA, 90% IgM, 90% IgG, 0% IgE
MacLean 1992 34 Sialyl‐Tn yes ELISA unknown 96%
Mohebtash 2011 14 MUC1, CEA no      
Morse 2011 8 APC, HHR6A, BAP31, replication protein A, Abl‐binding protein 3c, cyclin I, toposiomerase IIα/β, integrin β 8 subunit precursor, CDC2, TACE, g‐catenin, EEDDR1 no      
Nishikawa 2006 4 NY‐ESO‐1 no      
O'Cearbhaill 2016 24 GM2, Globo‐H, Tn, TF, sTN yes ELISA IgM titer > 1:80 or at least 4‐fold increase from baseline IgM: GM2 25%, Globo‐H 8%, Tn 58%, TF 67%, sTn 92%
IgG: GM2 17%, Globo‐H 58%, Tn 83%, TF 25%, sTN 67%
20/24 responded to at least 3 antigens
Odunsi 2007 18 NY‐ESO‐1 yes ELISA unknown 22%
Odunsi 2012 22 NY‐ESO‐1 yes ELISA unknown 50%
Odunsi 2014 12 NY‐ESO‐1 yes ELISA reciprocal titer > 100 4 patients remained seropositive
5/6 became seropositive
no differences between cohorts.
Ohno 2009 6 WT1 no      
Peethambaram 2009 4 Her‐2/Neu yes ELISA unknown unknown
Rahma 2012 21 p53 no      
Sabbatini 2000 25 Lewis Y yes ELISA unknown 67%
Sabbatini 2007 11 GM2, Globo‐H, Lewis Y, Tn‐MUC1, Tn(c), sTN(c), TF(c) yes ELISA negative to ≥ 1:40 or 8‐fold increase 89% ≥ 3 antigens; 22% GM2, 33% Globo‐H, 11% Lewis Y, 100% Tn‐MUC1, 44% Tn(c), 44% sTN(c), 78% TF(c)
Sabbatini 2012 28 NY‐ESO‐1 yes ELISA ≥ 100 cohort 1: 25%, C2: 46%, C3: 91%
Sabbatini 2017 86 Globo‐H, GM2, MUC1‐TN, TF yes unknown 1:40 or 2‐fold increase IgG: GLOBO‐H 7%, GM2 8%, MUC1‐TN 32%, MUC1 45%, TF 13%
IgM: GLOBO‐H 21%, GM2 26%, MUC1‐TN 40%, MUC1 49%, TF 22%
Sandmaier 1999 7 Sialyl‐Tn yes ELISA ≥ 1:20 100% IgM, 80% IgG
Suzuki 2016 32 GPC3 no      
Takeoka 2017 2 NY‐ESO‐1 yes ELISA optical density cutoff value 0.47 > 2
Takeuchi 2013 38 HLA‐A24: FOXM1, MELK, HJURP, VEGFR1, VEGFR2
HLA‐A02: HIG2, VEGFR1, VEGFR2
no      
Tsuda 2004 5 patient‐tailored cocktail yes ELISA unknown 67%
Vermeij 2012 12 p53 no      

SD: standard deviation.