Gordon 2004.
Methods | Uncontrolled phase II study | |
Participants | 20 ovarian cancer patients with recurrent disease | |
Interventions | Intravenous monoclonal antibody (oregovomab ‐ CA‐125) | |
Outcomes | Survival (time to progression/survival) Tumour responses Immune responses: humoral (Ab2, Ab3, HAMA), cellular Adverse events |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | High risk | Uncontrolled trial |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | Uncontrolled trial |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Information insufficient to permit judgement of ‘low risk’ or ‘high risk’ |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Information insufficient to permit judgement of ‘low risk’ or ‘high risk’ |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Information insufficient to permit judgement of ‘low risk’ or ‘high risk’ |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Information insufficient to permit judgement of ‘low risk’ or ‘high risk’ |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Information insufficient to permit judgement of ‘low risk’ or ‘high risk’ |