Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 10;2018(9):CD007287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007287.pub4

Sabbatini 2006.

Methods Randomised open‐label multi‐centre phase I study
Participants 42 stage II‐IV ovarian cancer patients after chemotherapy for recurrence of disease with complete clinical response or measurable disease (< 2 cm)
Interventions Intramuscular (IM) or subcutaneous (SC) monoclonal antibody (abagovomab ‐ CA‐125): 4 cohorts (2× IM; 2× SC; 0.2 mg or 2 mg)
Outcomes Survival (time to progression)
Tumour responses
Immune response: humoral (Ab3, HAMA), cellular
Adverse events
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Standard 2 × 2 factorial design
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Information insufficient to permit judgement of ‘low risk’ or ‘high risk’
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No blinding or incomplete blinding, but review authors judge that the outcome is not likely to be influenced by lack of blinding
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Information insufficient to permit judgement of ‘low risk’ or ‘high risk’
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Reporting of attrition/exclusions insufficient to permit judgement of ‘low risk’ or ‘high risk’
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Information insufficient to permit judgement of ‘low risk’ or ‘high risk’
Other bias Low risk No other sources of bias detected