Nishikawa 2004.
Methods | RCT, parallel design, single‐centre | |
Participants |
Total number of randomized participants: 50 Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Type of surgery: laparoscopic surgery (choledocholithotomy, colectomy, sigmoidectomy) Baseline characteristics TIVA group
Inhalational maintenance group
Country: Japan Setting: hospital |
|
Interventions |
TIVA group Participants: n = 25; 0 losses Induction details: 100% O2 via face mask for 3 minutes prior to induction. Induction with propofol using 4 µg/mL TCI. Use of 2% lidocaine solution for injection pain Maintenance details: 4 µg/mL propofol TCI. Study authors report mean (SD) range of 1.2 (± 0.2) µg/mL to 2.7 (± 0.2) µg/mL propofol. Use of clinical signs to maintain anaesthesia Additional regional anaesthesia: epidural anaesthesia: 6 mL to 8 mL of 1.5% lidocaine, followed by continuous epidural administration at a rate of 4 mL/hour to 6 mL/hour throughout surgery Inhalational maintenance group Participants: n = 25; 0 losses Induction details: 100% oxygen via face mask for 3 minutes prior to induction. 5% sevoflurane and 100% oxygen at 6 L/min until inspired limb‐drug concentration was > 4%. Vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg. Maintenance details: sevoflurane with O2/air mix at total gas flow of 3 L/min. Vecuronium 1 mg to 2 mg IV boluses as required. Study authors report mean (SD) range of 0.9% (± 0.1%) to 1.7% (± 0.4%) sevoflurane |
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes |
Funding/declarations of interest: not reported Study dates: not reported |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Participants were "randomly assigned by a sealed envelope technique". Insufficient information |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Described as "randomly assigned by a sealed envelope technique". Insufficient information |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Not feasible to blind anaesthetists to intervention groups |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Delirium was assessed by a psychiatrist blinded to intervention group. Data on emergence times was assessed by a nurse who was blinded to intervention group. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No apparent loss of study participants |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Study authors do not report clinical trials registration. Not feasible to judge risk of selective outcome reporting |
Other bias | Low risk | No other source of bias identified |