Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 1;2015(4):CD002919. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002919.pub3

Steiner 1998.

Methods Multi‐centre, double‐blind, randomised, parallel study: S‐fluoxetine versus placebo. Control for symptomatic/analgesic medications use
Participants Country: United Kingdom
 N = 53
 Sex: 13 M, 40 F
 Mean age: 37.5 S‐fluoxetine, 39 placebo
 Diagnosis: migraine (according to International Headache Society Criteria, IHS 1988) with a 1‐year or longer history and 6 to 18 attacks reported in the previous 3 months
 Exclusion criteria: patient using medications for migraine prophylaxis or chronic treatment for depression, breast feeding and pregnancy, drug or alcohol abuse, participation in previous trials
 Recruitment: 3 headache centres in the London region. Patients stratified at each centre according to historical attack frequency
Interventions N = 27 S‐fluoxetine 40 mg/day
 N = 26 placebo
Active treatment: 12 weeks
Outcomes Primary efficacy measures:
 1. Headache frequency (attacks/28 days)
 Secondary efficacy measures:
 2. Migraine days/28 days
 3. Attack intensity (rating scale from '1 = mild attack' to '3 = severe')
 4. Symptomatic/analgesic drug consumption (dose/attack)
 5. Patient's Global Impression of Disease intensity (0 to 100 mm visual analogue scale)
Notes 65 patients recruited, 53 randomised
 20 (38%) drop‐outs:
 3 for non‐adherence to treatment
 S‐fluoxetine: 9 (4 for side effects; 1 for inadequate response; 4 reason not specified)
 Placebo: 8 (4 for side effects, 1 for inadequate response, 3 reason not specified)
 Per protocol analysis
Sample size calculation done, drop‐out rate higher than expected
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk No information
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Drugs identical in appearance
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Substantial drop‐out rate, balanced, reason fully reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No information
Other bias High risk Financial support provided by Sepracor Inc. (Marlborough, MA, USA)