Methods | Random allocation Single‐blind Study duration: 3 months Dropout: 11% Location: Australia Recruitment: through posters and word‐of‐mouth |
|
Participants |
Population: full‐time desk‐based employees in the Charlottetown area. Intervention group: 16 participants Control group: 12 participants Demographics: Mean age in years: intervention 43.2 (SD 9.7), control 48.9 (SD 11.4) BMI: intervention group 36.5 (SD 9) kg/m², control group 34.6 (SD 7) kg/m² |
|
Interventions |
Duration: 3 months Intervention: sit‐stand desk Control: no sit‐stand desk |
|
Outcomes |
Outcome name, measurement time/tool (units of measurement)
|
|
Notes | The project was supported by StepsCount, Inc | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Participants were randomly assigned via coin flip to intervention and control group. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not reported |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Four participants were excluded from analysis (14% attrition). |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All outcomes mentioned in the study protocol were reported. |
Baseline comparability/ imbalance | High risk | Participants in the control group were older (48.9 years, SD 11.4) than the intervention group (43.2 years, SD 9.7) and the intervention group had higher BMI (36.5 kg/m2, SD 9) than the control group (34.6 kg/m2 SD 7). |
Validity of outcome measure | Low risk | activPal accelerometer is a valid instrument for assessing physical activity and sedentary behaviour |