Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 20;2018(6):CD010912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010912.pub4
Methods Random allocation
Single‐blind
Study duration: 14 weeks
Dropouts: 14%
Location: Australia
Recruitment: participants were recruited via an email
Participants Population: employees of Lockheed Martin Mission System and Training business unit: primarily develops software solutions and training/simulation technologies for both civil and commercial markets. 2500 full‐time employees of whom 90% in sedentary computer work for a large percentage of their workday
Intervention group: ergonomic training (16 participants), adjustable desks (23 participants), training and desks (20 participants)
Control group: 13 participants
Demographics: mean age in years: 37.2 (SD 9.4)
BMI: 26.9 (SD 4.4) kg/m2
Interventions Duration of intervention: 14 weeks
Intervention: Training vs. adjustable desks vs. training and desks
Control: no intervention
Outcomes Outcome name, measurement time/tool (units of measurement)
  • Changes in sitting/standing/walking time (minutes/9‐hour workday) assessed by self report at week 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 10, 14

  • Discomfort level, musculoskeletal pain, fatigue

Notes No conflict of interest reported
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Participants were listed out in Excel and randomly placed into one of the four groups.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Not reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk < 10% attrition rate
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No protocol; all the outcomes mentioned in the methods section are reported.
Baseline comparability/ imbalance Unclear risk Baseline characteristics of participants not reported
Validity of outcome measure High risk Only mentioned self report. No information on validity of questionnaires used.