Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 4;2018(9):CD013102. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013102

Adler 2004.

Methods Randomised trial
Participants 533 patients with depression and/or dysthymia (intervention: 268; control: 265) .
9 Eastern Massachusetts primary care practices
USA
Year of study: Not stated.
Interventions Pharmacists assessed a range of variables; medication history, medication regimen for drug issues, drug efficacy and toxicity, education about depression including symptoms and antidepressants, encouraged anti‐depressant therapy and maintained strong therapeutic communication with patients. This was tailored towards the patient's needs in accordance with depression guidelines. Pharmacists spent 70 minutes per patient across a 6‐month period; minimal intervention was to be 9 appointments over 18 months.
Outcomes Modified Beck Depression Inventory (mBDI) at 6 months
Notes Funding source: National Institute of Mental Health under grant RO1 MH56214
Conflict of interest: None stated.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomised by a "computerised coin‐flip" built into the screener
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Randomisation is post‐enrolment
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All Outcomes/Outcome 1 High risk Outcome are self‐reported and no blinding of personnel or participants
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All Outcomes/Outcome 1 High risk Non‐blinded patients acted as their own assessors.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Between group attrition < 10%.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes reported
Other bias Low risk None identified