Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 4;2018(9):CD013102. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013102

Hawes 2013.

Methods Randomised trial
Participants 61 participants (intervention 24; control 37)
Academic medical centre
 USA
Year of study: October 2009 to April 2011
Interventions Intervention group received a care transitions clinic visit with a clinical pharmacist 72 hours post‐discharge. The visit included medication history, identifying and resolving medication discrepancies, creating a current medication list and counselling on medication use. Discrepancies between the Best Possible Medication Discharge List (BPMDL) and the discharge summary were identified and characterised.
Outcomes Number of re‐hospitalisations
Notes Funding source: Funding from the American College of Clinical Pharmacy Ambulatory Care Practice and Research Network was used to provide compensation in the form of a $15 gift card from a large retail store to subjects for study participation.
Conflict of interest: None stated
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk During the first year of the study, 30 patients were enrolled and a random number generator was used for randomisation. Because of unequal allocation of patients to the study arms, block randomisation with a block size of 4 was used for the second year of the study, during which 31 patients were enrolled.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient Information
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All Outcomes/Outcome 1 High risk Potential for bias (non‐blinded)
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All Outcomes/Outcome 1 Low risk Seems unlikely. Rehospitalisation
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk All participants completed the trial.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All reported
Other bias Unclear risk Baseline data not shown in full