Hawes 2013.
Methods | Randomised trial | |
Participants | 61 participants (intervention 24; control 37) Academic medical centre USA Year of study: October 2009 to April 2011 |
|
Interventions | Intervention group received a care transitions clinic visit with a clinical pharmacist 72 hours post‐discharge. The visit included medication history, identifying and resolving medication discrepancies, creating a current medication list and counselling on medication use. Discrepancies between the Best Possible Medication Discharge List (BPMDL) and the discharge summary were identified and characterised. | |
Outcomes | Number of re‐hospitalisations | |
Notes | Funding source: Funding from the American College of Clinical Pharmacy Ambulatory Care Practice and Research Network was used to provide compensation in the form of a $15 gift card from a large retail store to subjects for study participation. Conflict of interest: None stated |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | During the first year of the study, 30 patients were enrolled and a random number generator was used for randomisation. Because of unequal allocation of patients to the study arms, block randomisation with a block size of 4 was used for the second year of the study, during which 31 patients were enrolled. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient Information |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All Outcomes/Outcome 1 | High risk | Potential for bias (non‐blinded) |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All Outcomes/Outcome 1 | Low risk | Seems unlikely. Rehospitalisation |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All participants completed the trial. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All reported |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Baseline data not shown in full |