Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 4;2018(9):CD013102. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013102

Krska 2001.

Methods Randomised trial
Participants 381 elderly patients (intervention 168; control 164; numbers were only given for those that completed the study)
Number of participating practices unclear
Grampian, Scotland
Year of study: Not stated.
Interventions Pharmacists interviewed patients in their homes for medication use, use of health and social services and to distribute prescribed medicines and a care plan; listing care issues, output, planned actions and pharmacist input.
2 interviews over 3 months.
Outcomes HbA1c
SF‐36
Notes Funding source:
Conflict of interest:
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "Following stratification by number of drugs, number of cardiovascular drugs and the presence of a non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drug other than low‐dose aspirin on the repeat prescription, patients were allocated randomly to intervention or control."
Therefore unclear about the actual method of randomisation for each participant. Only states method for practice.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All Outcomes/Outcome 1 High risk No blinding and self‐reported outcome
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All Outcomes/Outcome 1 High risk No blinding and self‐reported outcome
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Between group attrition < 10%. Overall completion rate > 80%.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes reported
Other bias Low risk None identified