Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 4;2018(9):CD013102. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013102

Sidel 1990.

Methods Randomised trial
Participants 284 elderly patients (intervention 141; control 143) who were Medicare recipients living in the study area
1 pharmacist
Norwood, New York City, USA
Year of study: Not stated.
Interventions Patient‐specific packet containing information on prescription and medication, home‐visit explained this packet, could contact physicians if wanted, counselled patient about drug use, encouraged adherence and checked for out‐of‐date medicine. At least 2 visits by pharmacist across 6 x 1‐month periods, with additional phone contact as necessary.
Outcomes Total Ambulatory Care visits past 3 months (change scores) at 36 months
Notes Funding source: National Institute on Aging (P01AG03424 and R0 lAG08125)
Conflict of interest: Not stated
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Assigned by randomised tables
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Separate people enrolled and randomised participants.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All Outcomes/Outcome 1 Unclear risk Little information about blinding or probable consequences
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All Outcomes/Outcome 1 Unclear risk Little information about blinding or probable consequences
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Between group attrition < 10% however, overall high attrition >20%
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes reported
Other bias Low risk None identified