Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 4;2018(9):CD013102. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013102

Tang 2014.

Methods Randomised trial
Participants 124 participants with epilepsy (intervention 59: control 65)
Patients with epilepsy who were treated at the outpatient clinic of Neurology
Huashan Hospital, University of Fudan, Shanghai, China
Year of study: Not stated.
Interventions Education and behavioural intervention
Intervention patients were educated by a pharmacist according to the guidelines of the American Society of Health‐System Pharmacists about pharmacist‐conducted patient education and counselling. Patients received monthly calls from the pharmacist and were instructed about their medications and asked to adhere to their anti‐epileptic medication. There was also a behavioural intervention based on cue‐dose training therapy. The medication schedule used in this programme was presented in the form of a table that illustrated the daily medication therapy of patients with pictures of anti‐epileptic medication, and it provided patients with cues to take their medications.
Frequency: Monthly phone calls, initial education session, persistent cues
Duration: 6 months
Outcomes Seizure control (50% reduction from baseline), Quality of life
Notes Funding source: Not specified
Conflict of interest: None stated
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk A list of 300 random numbers between 0 and 9 was generated using a statistical package. The patients were numbered according to the order in which they were recruited. Patients who had received an even randomly‐generated number were assigned to group I, and patients who received odd numbers were assigned to group II.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All Outcomes/Outcome 1 High risk Unblinded study with substantial potential bias
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All Outcomes/Outcome 1 Low risk Seizure change: low risk
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Between group attrition < 10%.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All reported
Other bias Low risk None