Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 28;2018(6):CD012721. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012721.pub2

SNEGOVIK.

Methods Study design: two‐arm, individual, RCT
Centres: not reported
Start of enrolment: not reported
End of enrolment: not reported
Follow‐up: 3 months
Run‐in period: not reported
Participants Inclusion criteria: "in ambulatory patients (pts) with arterial hypertension and CHF and preserved systolic left ventricular (LV) function" "According including/exclusion criteria pts have had seated systolic BP(SBP)≤160mmHg and diastolic BP(DBP) ≤ 95mmHg at randomization." "with stable symptomatic CHF (NYHA class II‐III) as a result of arterial hypertension (AH) with preserved LV ejection fraction (EF) ≥ 50%"
Exclusion criteria: not reported
Randomised (N): 726 (416 intervention, 310 control)
Withdrawn (N): not reported
Lost to follow‐up (N): not reported
Analysed (N): not reported
Age not reported
Sex not reported
Ethnicity not reported
Systolic blood pressure not reported
Heart rate not reported
BMI not reported
Serum creatinine not reported
B‐type natriuretic peptide not reported
NT pro B‐type natriuretic peptide not reported
LVEF not reported
NYHA class not reported
Hypertension not reported
Diabetes not reported
Atrial fibrillation not reported
Hospitalisation for heart failure: not reported
Coronary heart disease not reported
Stroke not reported
Diuretic not reported
Digoxin not reported
Beta‐blocker not reported
ACEI not reported
ARB not reported
MRA not reported
Interventions Intervention: quinapril
Comparator: "conventional treatment, recommended for CHF [congestive heart failure] and AH [arterial hypertension] treatment"
Concomitant medication: not reported
Outcomes Planned: unclear
Reported: NYHA, 6MWD, clinical status, QoL (MLHFQ), 2D echocardiography, blood pressure
Notes Unable to find contact details to ask investigators for end scores for QoL, full publication of results and mortality data.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk "were randomly assigned" but no detail
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk not reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk not reported
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk not reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk not reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk not reported
Other bias High risk published conference abstract only