Table 1: Comparative accuracy of RGNs using dRMSD.

The average dRMSD (lower is better) achieved by RGNs and the top five servers at each CASP is shown for the novel folds (left) and known folds (right) categories. Numbers are based on common set of structures predicted by top 5 servers during each CASP. A different RGN was trained for each CASP, using the corresponding ProteinNet training set containing all sequences and structures available prior to the start of that CASP. See also Table S1–S3.

	FM (novel folds) category (Å)						TBM (known folds) category (Å)
	CASP7	CASP8	CASP9	CASP10	CASP11	CASP12	CASP7	CASP8	CASP9	CASP10	CASP11	CASP12
RGN	9.3	7.3	8.7	10.0	8.5	10.7	5.6	5.9	6.5	6.9	7.4	6.9
1st Server	9.3	8.3	9.0	10.3	9.3	11.0	4.0	4.3	5.2	5.3	5.8	4.7
2nd Server	9.9	8.6	9.1	10.6	9.6	11.2	4.0	4.6	5.2	5.4	6.0	4.8
3rd Server	10.0	9.2	9.7	10.9	11.2	11.3	4.1	4.8	5.4	5.7	6.5	5.6
4th Server	10.1	9.9	10.1	11.7	11.7	11.4	4.2	5.0	5.4	5.9	6.8	5.8
5th Server	10.4	10.4	13.5	12.0	12.9	13.0	4.8	5.0	5.5	7.2	6.9	5.9