Methods | Randomised controlled trial | |
Participants | 67 preterm infants (27 to 33 weeks) Birth weight < 1600 g. Excluded if "congenital anomaly or major disease" Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, USA 1980 to 1982 | |
Interventions | Term formula milk (N = 26) versus unfortified, pasteurised donor breast milk (N = 41). Feeds were assigned until the infant reached a weight of 1800 g or until withdrawn from the study because of feeding intolerance or NEC | |
Outcomes | Time to regain birth weight Mean daily gain in weight, length and head circumference, from regaining birth weight until reaching 1800 g Data on adverse events can be determined, although these were not primary endpoints of the study | |
Notes | Although the report gave information on adverse outcomes, the 7 affected infants were withdrawn from the study and not included in the analyses of growth rates. Therefore, growth data are reported for 20 infants in each arm of the trial | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Random number table |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Method not stated "Any infant withdrawn from the study was replaced by the next one enrolled"; implies lack of allocation concealment for these infants |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information given |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | 7 out of 67 (10%) with adverse outcomes (NEC, mortality) were not assessed for growth outcomes. This included 6/26 (23%) in the formula group and 1/41 (2.4%) in the donor breast milk group, so potential bias 100% follow‐up and low risk of bias for mortality and NEC |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Protocol not available |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Funded by Mead Johnson Nutrition |