Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 20;2018(6):CD002971. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002971.pub4
Methods Randomised controlled trial
Participants 67 preterm infants (27 to 33 weeks) Birth weight < 1600 g. Excluded if "congenital anomaly or major disease" Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, USA 1980 to 1982
Interventions Term formula milk (N = 26) versus unfortified, pasteurised donor breast milk (N = 41). Feeds were assigned until the infant reached a weight of 1800 g or until withdrawn from the study because of feeding intolerance or NEC
Outcomes Time to regain birth weight Mean daily gain in weight, length and head circumference, from regaining birth weight until reaching 1800 g Data on adverse events can be determined, although these were not primary endpoints of the study
Notes Although the report gave information on adverse outcomes, the 7 affected infants were withdrawn from the study and not included in the analyses of growth rates. Therefore, growth data are reported for 20 infants in each arm of the trial
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Random number table
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Method not stated
"Any infant withdrawn from the study was replaced by the next one enrolled"; implies lack of allocation concealment for these infants
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk No information given
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Unclear risk 7 out of 67 (10%) with adverse outcomes (NEC, mortality) were not assessed for growth outcomes. This included 6/26 (23%) in the formula group and 1/41 (2.4%) in the donor breast milk group, so potential bias
100% follow‐up and low risk of bias for mortality and NEC
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Protocol not available
Other bias Unclear risk Funded by Mead Johnson Nutrition