Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 31;2018(8):CD008831. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008831.pub3

Mansouri‐Tehrani 2016.

Methods Study design: placebo‐controlled RCT with 3 parallel groups
Duration of the study, recruitment: October 2012 to May 2013
Follow‐up: 5 weeks
Country: Iran
Participants 78 participants between 20 and 85 years of age with diagnosis of pelvic cancer (colorectal, prostate, endometrial, bladder, ovarian, cervical, bone sarcoma) who were about to receive radiotherapy (11 participants dropped out)
Exclusion criteria: opioid usage, antimicrobial treatment, presence of any acute or chronic gastrointestinal condition associated with diarrhoea for ≥ 1 month before inclusion
Mean age ± SD: 63.7 ± 15.1 versus 57.9 ± 17.5 versus 64.2 ± 11.7 years
Male/female: 14/8 versus 8/13 versus 17/7
Cancer site, n:
  • Colorectal: 6 versus 9 versus 9

  • Prostate: 6 versus 3 versus 6

  • Endometrium: 3 versus 5 versus 2

  • Bladder: 4 versus 0 versus 4

  • Ovary: 2 versus 1 versus 1

  • Cervix: 1 versus 1 versus 2

  • Bone sarcoma: 0 versus 2 versus 0

Interventions Probiotics: ‘LactoCareOD’ (Zist Takhmir Company, Tehran, Iran) containing Lactobacillus casei 1.5 × 10⁹ CFU, Lactobacillus acidophilus 1.5 × 10¹º CFU, Lactobacillus rhamnosus 3.5 × 10⁹ CFU, Lactobacillus bulgaricus 2.5 × 10⁸ CFU, Bifidobacterium breve 1 × 10¹º CFU, Bifidobacterium longum 5 × 10⁸ CFU, and Streptococcus thermophilus 1.5 × 10⁸ CFU per 500 mg
Intervention group 1 (n = 22): 2 probiotic capsules per day after consumption of 150 grams of low‐fat yogurt
Intervention group 2 (n = 21): 2 probiotic capsules and 30 grams honey per day after consumption of 150 grams of low‐fat yogurt and 15 grams of honey at night
Placebo group (n = 24): 2 placebo capsules per day after consumption of 150 grams of low‐fat yogurt
All participants received conventional radiotherapy for 4 to 5 weeks (total dose from 4000 to 5000 cGy (1.8 Gy/d))
Outcomes Severity of diarrhoea according to the Common Toxicity Criteria of the National Cancer Institute, stool consistency according to an adapted Bristol Scale, daily number of bowel movements, need for antidiarrhoeal medication, bloating
Notes Trial registration: IRCT2015030421338N1
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk "A randomized, placebo‐controlled study was performed"/"Simple randomization was used to allocate patients to three groups"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No details provided
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No details provided, but group 1 received probiotics and group 3 (control group) received similar medication with placebo capsules
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 Subjective outcomes Unclear risk "The patients evaluated for the daily number of bowel movement (defecation), diarrhea grade, stool consistency score, the need for antidiarrheal medication and bloating weekly by one person" 
 Not sure whether this person was unaware of the treatment group
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 Objective outcomes Low risk Double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial: low risk for assessment of objective outcomes (mortality)
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 Subjective outcomes Unclear risk "Among 78 patients involved in this study, 11 patients were excluded for failure to follow up" 
 Reasons for dropout and intervention group of dropouts not presented
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 Objective outcomes Unclear risk "Among 78 patients involved in this study, 11 patients were excluded for failure to follow up" 
 Reasons for dropout and intervention group of dropouts not presented
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Outcomes presented according to trial registration form (IRCT2015030421338N1); laboratory outcomes reported in another paper
Other bias Low risk No indications of other bias