Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 15;2018(3):CD011481. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011481.pub2

GlaxoSmithKline 2002.

Methods Study design: Randomised controlled trial
Study grouping: Parallel group
Blinding: Double
Duration: 12 weeks
Multicentre
Participants Baseline characteristics
Paroxetine
  • Male, N (%): 10 (33)

  • Age, mean (SD): 51.8 (17.6)


Placebo
  • Male, N (%): 11 (46)

  • Age, mean (SD): 46.3 (17.9)


Inclusion criteria: Participants were males or females aged > 18 years suffering from 1 or more of the following anxiety disorders of non‐severe degree in axis I: panic attack disorder (with or without agoraphobia), GAD, social anxiety/social phobia or mixed anxiety and depression disorder with significant anxiety; people continuously treated with benzodiazepines (any) for at least 6 consecutive months prior to the screening visit at doses between 2 and 8 mg/day of lorazepam or equivalent; a total score ≤ 16 on the HAM‐A and MADRS at screening and baseline.
Exclusion criteria: People suffering (or diagnosed within the 6 months prior to screening) from 1 or more of the following conditions: major depressive episode; post‐traumatic stress disorder; obsessive‐compulsive disorder; eating behavioural disorders, people diagnosed with dysthymia or who had suffered from dysthymia in the 6 months prior to screening; people with a concomitant psychotic disorder, or history of psychotic disorder; people having a concomitant bipolar disorder or history of bipolar disorder, or having a cyclothymic disorder, or had suffered from it in the past; people who met DSM‐IV (protocol appendix O) criteria for substance (alcohol or drugs) abuse or dependence, except for benzodiazepine, within 6 months prior to screening; current suicidal or homicidal risk; and people who had electroconvulsive therapy in the 3 months prior to screening.
Pretreatment: No significant group differences
Interventions Intervention characteristics
Benzodiazepine taper schedule: 4‐week open‐label run‐in period during which participants were switched from their original benzodiazepine to an equivalent dosage of chlordemethyldiazepam (between 2 and 8 mg/d). The taper schedule during the treatment phase not described.
  1. Benzodiazepine taper + paroxetine 10 mg/d for the first week, 10 to 20 mg/d during weeks 2 to 8, 20 mg/d during weeks 9 to 12(N = 30)

  2. Benzodiazepine taper + placebo(N = 24)

Outcomes
  • Serious adverse events

  • Anxiety: HAM‐A

  • Non‐serious adverse events

  • Relapse to benzodiazepine use

  • Benzodiazepine withdrawal symptoms: BWSQ

  • Benzodiazepine cessation

Identification Sponsorship source: GlaxoSmithKline
Country: Italy
Setting: Outpatients
Declarations of interest: Not mentioned
Comments: Unpublished phase III study
Author's name: GlaxoSmithKline
Institution:
Email:
Address: Clinical Study Register (www.gskclinicalstudyregister.com) 2002
Notes Change scores extracted, final scores not available. Standard deviation calculated from CI using the following formula:
SE = (upper limit – lower limit of CI)/3.92
Standard deviation σ = standard error x √n
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "12‐week double blind, multicentre, randomised, placebo‐controlled, parallel group"
Comment: Not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: Not described
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "Subjects were randomised to either paroxetine or placebo and entered the 12‐week double‐blind, randomised treatment phase. Dosage of paroxetine or matched placebo started with..."
Comment: Double‐blind and using matched placebo
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: Not described
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: 2 versus 8 participants withdrew, but ITT analysis data extracted for this meta‐analysis.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Comment: No protocol available, benzodiazepine dose at follow‐up not described.
Other bias High risk Comment: Study funded by the study drug manufacturer, no information available on involvement in design, data collection, etc.