Lacroix 1986.
Methods | Parallel‐group randomised controlled trial | |
Participants |
Baseline characteristics Number randomised: 40 participants Number analysed: 38 participants Cimetidine
Placebo
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Baseline imbalances: Mechanical ventilation was used in 2 times more patients in the placebo group |
|
Interventions |
Cimetidine
Placebo
Adherence to treatment: ‐ Duration of trial: ‐ Duration of follow‐up (days): ‐ |
|
Outcomes |
Outcomes sought in review and reported in trial
Outcome sought in review and not reported in trial
Outcomes reported in trial and not sought in review
|
|
Notes |
Setting: PICU, Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric intensive Care Unit, Hopital Sainte‐Justine, University of Montreal, Canada Sponsorship source: Smith Kline & French Laboratories Conflicts of interest: ‐ Ethics approval: Study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hopital Sainte‐Justine Informed consent: Written informed consent was obtained from a parent or guardian of each patient Clinical trials registration: ‐ Sample size calculation: We calculated a necessary sample size of 37 participants |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | High risk | Quote: "Allocation of treatment followed a double‐blind pattern, according to a list set up by the Smith Kline & French Laboratories from a table of random numbers" Judgement comment: list of random number set up by study sponsor. Some risk of bias suspected |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "Allocation of treatment followed a double‐blind pattern, according to a list set up by the Smith Kline & French Laboratories from a table of random numbers" Judgement comment: no details about allocation concealment reported |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Comment: "double‐blind pattern". Procedures for blinding not explicitly reported, but lack of blinding is unlikely to introduce bias to the outcomes or outcome measures |
Blinding (detection bias) Clinically important upper GI bleeding | Low risk | Quote: "UGIB noted from the nasogastric tube, which had been inserted in each patient. Outcome was assessed by the appearance of UGIB and by gastric fluid pH. Massive UGIB was defined as red or brown haemorrhage from the nasogastric tube associated with a decrease in arterial blood pressure of >20 mm Hg or with an acute decrease in haemoglobin level of >2 gm/dl; obvious UGIB was defined as red or brown haemorrhage from the nasogastric tube without a decrease in arterial blood pressure or in haemoglobin level of >2 gm/dl; slight UGIB was defined as minimal bleeding appearing only at the aspiration of gastric fluid" Comment: criteria for diagnosis of this outcome reported objectively |
Blinding (detection bias) Nosocomial pneumonia | Unclear risk | Comment: Study did not address this outcome |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Adverse reactions of interventions | Unclear risk | Comment: no details about blinding of outcome assessors reported |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Comment: no incomplete outcome data suspected. All participants randomised at baseline were included in analyses |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Comment: All outcomes listed in the Methods section (GI bleeding) were also reported in the Results section |
Other bias | High risk | Comment: Industry participates in providing drugs and conducting the trial. Mechanical ventilation (risk factor for GI bleeding) was used more often in placebo group |