Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 3;2018(4):CD010597. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010597.pub2

Dogra 2002.

Methods
  • Study design: parallel RCT

  • Study duration: May 1999 to June 2001

  • Duration of follow‐up: 270 days

Participants
  • Setting: multicentre (2)

  • Country: Australia

  • Participants required insertion of a tunnelled catheter for the maintenance or commencement of HD

  • Number (participants/catheters): treatment group (44/55); control group (39/57)

  • Mean age ± SD (years): treatment group (55.7 ± 2.5); control group (59.3 ± 2.1)

  • Sex (% M/F): treatment group (45/55); control group (47/53)

  • Exclusion criteria: active sepsis; were on parenteral or prolonged (> 5 d) oral antibiotic therapy; allergy to gentamicin and/or citrate

Interventions Treatment group
  • Gentamicin: 2 mL of 40 mg/mL

  • Tri‐sodium citrate: 1mL of 3.13%


Control group
  • Heparin: 5000 U/mL

Outcomes
  • CRI

  • Infection‐free catheter survival

Notes
  • Funding source: not reported

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk "Block randomization using random number tables was performed by Clinical Trials Pharmacists, thereby ensuring allocation concealment"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Blinding of participants and personnel
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Blinding of microbiology staff
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Missing outcome data balanced in numbers across intervention groups, with similar reasons for missing data across groups;
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Describes the outcome according to objective
Other bias Unclear risk Funding source not reported