Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 3;2018(4):CD010597. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010597.pub2

Mortazavi 2011.

Methods
  • Study design: parallel RCT

  • Study duration: December 2009 to March 2010

  • Duration of follow‐up:

Participants
  • Setting: multicentre (2)

  • Country: Iran

  • Participants > 18 years, being dialysed with central tunnelled catheter (only if placed in the internal jugular vein), with a maximum time of 1 month post catheterisation, dialysis 3 times a week and having accepted to participate

  • Number (participants/catheters): treatment group (15/15); control group (15/15)

  • Mean age ± SD (years): treatment group (52 ± 10.30); control group (56 ± 9.6)

  • Sex (M/F): treatment group (7/8); control group (6/9)

  • Exclusion criteria: allergy to cefotaxime; antibiotic treatment within 2 weeks prior to enrolment; participants requiring a surrogate decision maker; catheters with blood flow rates < 300 mL/min, or requiring frequent thrombolytic solution dwells in the catheter lumen because of malfunction

Interventions Treatment group
  • Cefotaxime: 10 mg/mL

  • Heparin: 5000 UI/mL


Control group
  • Heparin: 5000 U/mL

Outcomes
  • CRI

Notes
  • Funding source: " No financial support received in support of the study:

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Used randomisation computerized block protocol
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Double‐blind study, probably were blind
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk All patient data reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Describes the outcome according to objective
Other bias Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement