Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 3;2018(4):CD010597. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010597.pub2

Nori 2006.

Methods
  • Study design: parallel RCT

  • Study duration: 4 October 2003 and 30 April 2004

  • Duration of follow‐up: not reported

Participants
  • Setting: multicentre (3)

  • Country: USA

  • Participants with either tunnelled or non tunnelled (only if placed in the internal jugular vein) catheter as their primary vascular access

  • Number (randomised/analysed/catheters): treatment group 1 (20/20/20); treatment group 2 (21/21/21); control group (21/20/21)

  • Mean age ± SEM (years): treatment group 1 (58 ± 3);treatment group 2 (58 ± 3) control group (59 ± 4)

  • Sex (M/F): treatment group 1 (11/9); treatment group 2 (13/8); control group (10/10)

  • Exclusion criteria: < 18 years; required a surrogate decision maker; antibiotic treatment within 2 weeks before the date of enrolment; catheters with blood flow rates < 300 mL/min; required frequent thrombolytic solution dwells in the catheter lumen for malfunction; admitted to an outside hospital for any illness; required thrombolytics for catheter thromboses on more than 3 occasions

Interventions Treatment group 1
  • Gentamicin: 4 mg/mL

  • Citrate: 3.13 %


Treatment group 1
  • Minocycline: 3 mg/mL

  • EDTA: 30 mg/mL


Control group
  • Heparin: 5000 U/mL

Outcomes
  • CRI

Notes
  • Funding source: None

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Permuted block randomisation was performed at each centre; method not reported
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Open‐label study
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk All patient data reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Describes the outcomes according to objectives
Other bias Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement