Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 3;2018(4):CD010597. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010597.pub2

Pervez 2002.

Methods
  • Study design: parallel RCT

  • Study duration: January 1999 to April 2000

  • Duration of follow‐up: not reported

Participants
  • Setting: single centre

  • Country: USA

  • Participants who underwent tunnelled catheter placement, including participants who had a tunnelled catheter changed over guide wire

  • Number (participants/catheters): treatment group (14/14); control group (22/22)

  • Mean age ± SE (years): treatment group I (53.7 ± 4.0); control group (47.6 ± 3.3)

  • Sex (M/F): treatment group I (10/4); control group (10/12)

  • Exclusion criteria: not reported

Interventions Treatment group
  • Tricitrasol: 46:7%

  • Gentamicin: 40 mg/mL


Control group
  • Heparin: 1000 U/mL

Outcomes
  • CRI

Notes
  • Catheter hub covered with a sterile plastic bag after cleaning with a 10% povidone iodine solution

  • Funding source: "This study was supported by the Dialysis Clinic Inc."

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Use computer‐generated number list
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk All patient data reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Describes the outcome according to objective
Other bias Unclear risk Was supported by the Dialysis Clinic Inc