Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 3;2018(4):CD010597. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010597.pub2

Shirzad 2013.

Methods
  • Study design: parallel RCT

  • Study duration: not reported

  • Duration of follow‐up: not reported

Participants
  • Setting: single centre

  • Country: Iran

  • Participants who underwent reinsertion of a tunnelled central catheter through a new access site

  • Number (participants/catheters): treatment group (58/59); control group (55/60)

  • Mean age ± SD (years): treatment group (78 ± 19); control group (75.5 ± 17)

  • Sex (M/F): treatment group (36/22); control group (32/23)

  • Exclusion criteria: active sepsis, receiving prolonged (> 7 days) antibiotic therapy (oral/parenteral) or allergies to cephalosporins; who could not be randomised within 3 dialysis sessions of new catheter insertion; catheter exchange over guidewires through the same exit site

Interventions Treatment group
  • Cefazolin: 5 mg/dL

  • Heparin: 2500 IU


Control group
  • Heparin: 2500 IU

Outcomes
  • Infection

Notes
  • Funding source: not reported

  • Translated from Persian

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Other bias Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement