Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 14;2018(8):CD012791. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012791.pub2

Whitebird 2013.

Methods Study design: randomised controlled trial
Study grouping: parallel group
Participants Inclusion criteria:
  • Primary carer of individuals with dementia living in the community

  • Older than 21

  • Satisfying requirements for intervention participation

  • No participation in a community carer support programme or similar programme (meditation or yoga and others)

  • Moderate‐to‐high level of self perceived stress


Exclusion criteria:
  • Psychiatric hospitalisations in the previous 2 years

  • Diagnoses of mental illness in the previous 2 years

  • Taking antipsychotic or anticonvulsion medication

  • Thoughts of harming themselves in the previous 6 months


Characteristics of carers:
  • N = 78

  • Mean age: 56.8 (SD 9.9)

  • Percentage of females: 88.5%

  • Relationship to individuals with dementia: adult children (74.4%); spouse, sibling, or friend (25.6%)

  • Average levels of carers' depressive symptoms at baseline (measured by CESD): 17.9 (SD 8.9) for participants in the intervention group, 19.2 (SD 11.8) for participants in the control group

  • Average levels of carer burden at baseline (measured by subjective stress burden subscale of MBCBS): 16.7 (SD 2.3) for participants in the intervention group, 16.9 (SD 2.8) for participants in the control group

Interventions MBSR
  • Duration: 8 weeks

  • No. of sessions: 8 sessions, 2.5 hours per session

  • Frequency: weekly

  • Delivery: face‐to‐face, group

  • Content of intervention:

    • class activities ("sitting and walking meditation, body scan meditation, and gentle Hatha yoga and stretching exercises")

    • 5‐hour retreat day

    • home practice: participants were encouraged to practice daily


A standard community caregiver education and social support (CCES)
  • Duration: 8 weeks

  • No. of sessions: 8 sessions, 2.5 hours per session

  • Frequency: weekly

  • Delivery: face‐to‐face, group

  • Content of intervention:

    • class activities (education, group‐based discussion, and social support)

    • 5‐hour wellness day

    • home practice: participants were encouraged to implement what they had learned

Outcomes Carers' depressive symptoms
  • Outcome type: continuous outcome

  • Reporting: fully reported

  • Scale: CESD

  • Data value: endpoint


Carers' anxiety
  • Outcome type: continuous outcome

  • Reporting: fully reported

  • Scale: STAI‐state

  • Data value: endpoint


Carer burden
  • Outcome type: continuous outcome

  • Reporting: fully reported

  • Scale: MBCBS‐subjective stress burden subscale

  • Data value: endpoint

Identification Sponsorship source: National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine of the National Institutes of Health under award number R21AT003654
Country: USA
Notes Adherence to intervention: 83% of participants attended at least 7 of the 8 weekly sessions; MBSR participants reported an average of 29 minutes per day of home practice.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote:
"... were randomly assigned using a computerized algorithm for simple randomization"
Comment:
Adequate allocation concealment
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Comment:
It is not possible to blind personnel or participants (or both) to psychosocial interventions of this nature.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Comment:
Assessment tools were self reported measures.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Comment:
  • Attrition percentages: 2.6% participants in the intervention group, 12.5% participants in the control group

  • Reasons for attrition: institutionalisation; time constraints; dissatisfaction with assignment to the control group

  • The study used intention‐to‐treat analyses, however the imputation method for missing data was not described.

Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Comment:
We did not find a published protocol.
Other risks of bias High risk We suspected a high risk of bias for inexplicable baseline imbalances, as anxiety in the control group was significantly higher than in the intervention group (P < 0.05).

CESD: Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale
 GDS: Geriatric Depression Scale
 MBCBS: Montgomery Borgatta Caregiver Burden Scale
 MBCT: mindfulness‐based cognitive therapy
 MBSR: mindfulness‐based stress reduction
 POMS: Profile of Mood States
 RMBPC: Revised Memory and Behavior Problems Checklist
 SD: standard deviation
 STAI: State‐Trait Anxiety Inventory
 ZBI: Zarit Burden Interview