Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 25;2018(6):CD012097. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012097.pub2

Comparison 1. DMEK versus DSAEK.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Best corrected visual acuity (logMAR) 4 140 Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) ‐0.14 [‐0.18, ‐0.10]
2 Endothelial cell count (cells/mm2) 4   Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3 Graft dislocation 4 144 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 5.4 [1.51, 19.27]
4 Corneal graft rejection 4   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
5 Primary graft failure 4   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected