NCT00706446.
Methods |
Study design: RCT Study grouping: parallel group Open label: yes Cluster RCT: no |
|
Participants |
Baseline characteristics No full text available and no results posted on clinicaltrials.gov. The following baseline characteristics were not available for either group
Inclusion criteria: clinical history consistent with asthma; current prescription for a LABA, either alone or in combination with an ICS; informed consent; non‐smoker (total lifetime smoking history < 10 pack‐years); no known contraindication to inhaled tiotropium (e.g. narrow angle glaucoma, history of bladder neck obstruction or significant symptoms related to prostatic hypertrophy) Exclusion criteria: lung disease other than asthma; established or suspected diagnosis of vocal cord dysfunction; significant unstable medical illness (other than asthma); history of life‐threatening asthma within 5 years; history of respiratory tract infection within 4 weeks; hyposensitisation therapy other than an established maintenance regimen; current use of, or allergy to, tiotropium; pregnancy or lactation; if able to bear children, not using acceptable contraception; inability to use inhalers; inability to participate over the 1‐year period |
|
Interventions |
Intervention characteristics LAMA add‐on
LABA add‐on
|
|
Outcomes | No full text available and no results posted on clinicaltrials.gov | |
Identification |
Sponsorship source: Brigham and Women's Hospital with collaboration from Harvard Clinical Research Institute and Massachusetts General Hospital Country: USA Setting: 2 centres Comments: study terminated Authors name: Elliot Israel, MD Institution: Brigham and Women's Hospital Email: eisrael@partners.org Address: Brigham and Women's Hospital Respiratory, 75 Francis St, Boston MA 02115 |
|
Notes | Study terminated | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Allocation was randomised ‐ no details provided |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details provided |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Open label |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Open label |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not applicable, study did not complete |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Study did not complete and hence no outcomes are reported. No interim results reported, or information regarding the decision to terminate |
Other bias | High risk | Study terminated prior to completion |