Rajanandh 2015.
Methods |
Study design: RCT Study grouping: parallel group Open label: yes Cluster RCT: no |
|
Participants |
Baseline characteristics LAMA add‐on
LABA add‐on
Inclusion criteria: aged 18‐60 years, both men and women diagnosed clinically with mild‐to‐moderate persistent asthma, with an improvement in FEV1 > 12% after bronchodilator inhalation. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to the study Exclusion criteria: participants with clinically significant renal, respiratory (other than asthma) cardiac, gastrointestinal, hepatic, endocrine disorders, haematological disorders, cancer or any other concurrent illness; participants who had undergone major surgery; unresolved upper respiratory tract infection within past 3 weeks of the pre‐study visit; corticosteroids during the month prior to the study; known or suspected hypersensitivity to study therapy or excipients; unwilling to give informed consent; pregnant and lactating women |
|
Interventions |
Intervention characteristics LAMA add‐on
LABA add‐on
|
|
Outcomes |
Continuous
No dichotomous outcomes were listed |
|
Identification |
Sponsorship source: SRM University Country: India Setting: Department of Pulmonary Medicine, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre Registration ID: CTRI/2012/08/002915 Authors name: Muhasaparur G. Rajanandh Institution: SRM College of Pharmacy, Tamil Nadu, India Email: mgrpharm@gmail.com Address: SRM College of Pharmacy, SRM University, Kattankulathur, Chennai, Kancheepuram, TAMIL NADU603 203, India |
|
Notes | Contacted author November 2014 ‐ awaiting full publication | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | A randomisation list was generated using Random allocation software, version 1.0 |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | "Concealment of optimization codes was done by serially numbered, opaque envelope model" Envelopes were sealed (CTRI website) |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Open‐label |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Open‐label. No description of measures taken to blind outcome assessors |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | 18% dropped out of tiotropium group and 19% dropped out of formoterol groups. "Per protocol analysis was performed" |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | The main trial was retrospectively registered (CTRI/2012/08/002915). All 4 outcomes were reported in the paper, although could not in sufficient detail to allow meta‐analysis (i.e. without group means and variance, or with details of a group comparison with level of statistical significance) |
Other bias | Low risk | None noted |
ACQ: Asthma Control Questionnaire; AE: adverse event; AQLQ: Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ED: emergency department; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FVC: forced vital capacity; HFA: hydrofluoroalkane; ICS: inhaled corticosteroids; ITT: intention to treat; L: litres; LABA: long‐acting beta2‐agonists; LAMA: long‐acting muscarinic antagonists; mcg: micrograms; MDI: metered dose inhaler; min: minute; N/A: not available; NR: not reported; OCS: oral corticosteroids; PC20: histamine provocative concentration causing a 20% drop in FEV1; PEF: peak expiratory flow; RCT: randomised controlled trial; SAE: serious adverse event; SD: standard deviation; SE: standard error; TB: tuberculosis.