Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 13;2014(6):CD001338. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001338.pub3

Comparison 20. Oral versus sublingual misoprostol (5): all women.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Caesarean section 1 100 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.56 [0.74, 3.26]
1.1 50 mcg 1 100 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.56 [0.74, 3.26]
2 Meconium‐stained liquor 1 100 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 10.5 [4.07, 27.09]
2.1 50 mcg 1 100 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 10.5 [4.07, 27.09]
3 Instrumental delivery 1 100 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.47 [0.22, 0.99]
3.1 50mcg 1 100 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.47 [0.22, 0.99]