Comparison 37. Oral miso 3‐hourly vs oral miso x2 then routine oxytocin (11): all women.

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Vaginal delivery not achieved in 24 hours	1	200	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.89 [0.56, 1.42]
2 Uterine hyperstimulation with FHR changes	1	200	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3 Caesarean section	1	200	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.87 [0.44, 1.73]
4 Uterine hyperstimulation without FHR changes	1	200	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	1.0 [0.06, 15.77]
5 Instrumental vaginal delivery	1	200	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	1.33 [0.31, 5.81]
6 Apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes	1	200	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
7 Neonatal intensive care unit admission	1	200	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	1.0 [0.06, 15.77]
8 Postpartum haemorrhage	1	200	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
9 Diarrhoea	1	200	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
10 Vomiting	1	200	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	1.33 [0.31, 5.81]