Turgal 2017.
Methods |
Design: RCT Recruitment method: through assessment of women presented to the hospital Method of randomisation: computerised random number generator program Setting: a university hospital |
|
Participants |
Inclusion: women with threatened abortion and with presence singleton pregnancy and live embryo, before 9 weeks of gestation Exclusion: non viable fetus, twin pregnancy, presence of subchorionic haematoma and history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, severe hepatic disorders, uterine leiomyoma, congential uterine anomaly and recurrent pregnancy loss Particpants randomised: 83 |
|
Interventions |
Intervention group: (42 women) oral micronised progesterone, 400 mg/d for 4 weeks Control group: (41 women) placebo |
|
Outcomes | Primary outcome:
Secondary outcomes:
|
|
Notes |
Journal: Journal of clinical Utrasound Year of publication: 2017 Country: Turkey Income status of the country: upper middle‐income Source of funding: not mentioned Conflict of interest: not mentioned |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computerised random number by using generator program |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Unclear |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Placebo was used |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Outcome is not affected by blinding of outcomes assessors |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Incomplete outcome data in 12 women (14.5%), equal in both groups |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All the prespecified outcomes were addressed |
Other bias | Low risk | No other biases |