Skip to main content
. 2006 Apr 19;2006(2):CD001387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001387.pub2

Colice 1996.

Methods RCT: 85 day (two arm) parallel group inhalation solution study.
 Randomisation: computer generated
 Blinding: double blind
 Excluded: not described.
 Withdrawals: described.
 Baseline characteristics: comparable
 Power calculation: not given.
 Intention to treat analysis: not stated
 Jadad Score:4
Participants Setting: USA, multi‐centre (11) study.
 223 subjects with stable COPD.
 mean age: 64 years 
 male/female: 60% / 40%
 mean baseline FEV1: 1.00 Litres or 39% predicted. No range given.
 Inclusion criteria: > or = 40 years of age, >10 year pack history of smoking, stable disease, FEV1 < or = 65% predicted, FEV1/FVC < or =70 %
 Exclusion criteria: history of asthma, allergic rhinitis or atopy, total blood eosinophil count >500/mm3, recent use of large doses of corticosteroids, recent MI (3 years), use of beta blockers, chronic home oxygen, other significant disease.
Interventions 1) 0.5 mg ipratropium 0.1% inhalation solution, three times daily.
 2) 2.5 mg albuterol 0.5% inhalation solution, three times daily.
 Medication was provided in 2.5ml vials and delivered by nebuliser, for 85 days.
Outcomes Primary outcomes measured on Test Day 1, 43, 85 : pulmonary function tests i.e.
 1)Test Day baseline FEV1, FVC
 2) Test Day peak change in FEV1, FVC
 3) Test Day AUC above test day baseline (0‐8 hr) FEV1, FVC.
 Secondary Outcomes included:
 I) HRQL using the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRQ) measured day 1, 43 and 85.
 Secondary Outcomes measured on fortnightly clinic visits to monitor:
 2) Daily PEFR‐ measured morning and evening and recorded in diary.
 3) adverse events.
 4) concomitant medication.
Notes Unpublished standard errors obtained from Boehringer Ingelheim and converted to standard deviations. Study quality details provided by Boehringer Ingelheim.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computer‐generated randomisation schedule
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Third party randomisation