Tashkin 1996.
Methods | RCT: 85 day (two arm) parallel group inhalation solution study. Randomisation: computer generated Blinding: double blind Excluded: not described. Withdrawals: described. Baseline characteristics: comparable Power calculation: not given. Intention to treat analysis not stated. Jadad Score:5 | |
Participants | Setting: USA, multi‐centre (8) study.
213 stable subjects with COPD.
mean age: 60.6 years
male : female= 67% : 33%
mean baseline FEV1: 1.07 Litres or 37.4% predicted.
range:0.36‐2.37 litres or 13‐64% predicted. Inclusion criteria: > or = 40 years of age, > or =10 year pack history of smoking, stable disease, FEV1 < or = 65% predicted, FEV1/FVC < or =70 %. Exclusion criteria: history of asthma, allergic rhinitis or atopy, total blood eosinophil count >500/mm3, recent MI (< 1 year), other significant disease, recent respiratory tract infection, narrow angle. |
|
Interventions | 1) 0.5 mg ipratropium 0.167% inhalation solution (0.3 ml), plus 15 mg metaproterenol 0.6% inhalation solution (2.5 ml), three times daily. 2) placebo (0.3 ml diluent) plus 15 mg metaproterenol 0.6% inhalation solution (2.5 ml), three times daily. Medication was delivered by nebuliser, for 85 days. | |
Outcomes | Outcomes measured on Days 1, 43 and 85: 1) pulmonary function i.e. Test Day baseline FEV1, FVC. 2) peak change in FEV1, FVC from test day baseline. 3) % change in FEV1, FVC from test day baseline. 4) FEV1, FVC AUC (0‐8 hr). 5) HRQL: Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRQ). Recorded in a daily diary card during run‐in period and study: 6) daily morning and evening PEFR. 7) COPD symptoms (wheeze, dyspnoea, cough, chest tightness). 8) additional medication use. | |
Notes | Testing for reversible airflow obstruction with a bronchodilator was not required. Unpublished standard errors obtained from Boehringer Ingelheim and converted to standard deviations. Study quality details provided by Boehringer Ingelheim. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computer generated |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Third party, off site. |