Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 22;2018(8):CD001955. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001955.pub4

Koren 1983.

Methods Randomised double‐blind controlled trial
Participants Study period: January 1979 to January 1980
Setting: paediatric division of the Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
Inclusion criteria: children aged from 8 months to 8 years hospitalised with croup (all with inspiratory stridor, dyspnoea, subcostal and/or suprasternal retraction, and a barking cough); informed consent given by the parents
Exlcusion criteria: evidence of associated bronchitis, bronchopneumonia, and acute epiglottitis
Baseline demographics (N = 78):
proportion males:laryngotracheitis (LT) group: treatment: 59%; control: 56%; spasmodic croup (SC) group: treatment: 57%; control: 64%
mean age in years, months:LT group: treatment: 2 years, 5 months; control: 2 years, 7 months; SC group: treatment: 2 years, 6 months; control: 2 years, 8 months
croup score: not measured
Interventions Children in all groups were sedated via rectal administration of 75 mg/kg of body weight of chloral hydrate.
Treatment (N = 40): single 0.60 mg/kg dose of intramuscular dexamethasone sodium phosphate (4 mg/mL)
Control (N = 38): single dose of intramuscular placebo solution of identical appearance
Outcomes Use of epinephrine and use of antibiotics
Notes Funding source: not reported
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: insufficient information provided to judge.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: insufficient information provided to judge.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "Dexamethasone sodium phosphate and a placebo solution of identical appearance were administered" "All evaluations were completed before the study code was opened"
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: no description of a third‐party outcome assessor. Carried over judgement from blinding of participants and personnel
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comment: no missing outcome data
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Comment: no protocol identified. All prespecified outcomes from methods appear in results.
Other bias Low risk Comment: no other sources of bias identified.
Overall risk of bias 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: at least 1 domain judged as unclear risk, and no domains judged as high risk.