Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 5;2018(7):CD011849. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011849.pub2

Chen 2014.

Methods 3‐Arm RCT
Participants Two years after Sichuan earthquake (2010‐2011), in which survivors experienced horrific sights and sounds, as their school buildings collapsed with students inside. A great number of survivors' friends and classmates were injured or died
Adolescents who lost at least 1 parent in the earthquake; scored > 18 points on the CRIES‐13 and thus were considered to have PTSD symptoms
Interventions Cognitive‐behavioural therapy (CBT): 16 participants
General support group: 12 participants
Non‐treatment group: 12 participants
Outcomes Chinese versions of 3 psychological instruments were used to evaluate outcomes of the interventions: The CRIES‐13 was used to assess PTSD symptoms, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES‐D) to assess depressive symptoms, and the Connor‐Davidson Resilience Scale (CD‐RISC) to measure psychological resilience
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "The 40 adolescents were randomly divided into three groups"
No further information
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information provided
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk The non‐treatment group did not receive any psychological placebo
Quote: "The volunteers visited the ten adolescents’ homes weekly for six weeks to provide support and assistance to them in dealing with problems at home and at school. No intervention or services were provided to the 12 students in the control group"
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No information provided
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Dropout of intervention sample 6/16; dropout of control group 2/12
Quote: "Only 32 adolescents completed the entire study. Six students were dropped from the CBT group, and two students were dropped from the general support group"
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Primary outcomes are reported
Therapist qualification Unclear risk Intervention was delivered by school staff
Treatment fidelity Unclear risk No information provided
Therapist/investigator allegiance Unclear risk No information provided
Other bias Unclear risk No information provided