Igreja 2004.
Methods | RCT | |
Participants | Adult men or women who were Mozambican civil war survivors (Mozambique is characterised by almost 3 decades of war); born in the region; having survived the war while living within regional war zones. Former refugees or displaced persons from other regions were excluded Age: mean 40 (SD 14) years |
|
Interventions | Testimony method: 66 participants Control group: 71 participants |
|
Outcomes | Psychiatric morbidity was measured with the Self‐Report Questionnaire (SRQ); shocking experiences by a section of the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire (HTQ); prevalence of nightmares with the Nocturnal Intrusions after Traumatic Experiences questionnaire (NITE); and post‐traumatic stress symptoms with the Self‐Inventory for PTSD (SIFP) | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "During the baseline measurements, every participant was given a consecutive number. By using a cut‐off point in the measurements of post‐traumatic stress symptoms, the group was divided into a case (N=137) and a non‐case group (N=69). Depending on whether their number was an even or odd one, participants belonging to the case group were respectively assigned to an intervention group (N=66) or a control group (N=71)" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information provided |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information provided |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Unclear who conducted assessments ‐ all by interview |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information provided |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Not all of the study’s prespecified outcomes have been reported. No protocol available |
Therapist qualification | Low risk | Intervention was delivered by a professional, in collaboration with 3 native speakers acting as interpreters |
Treatment fidelity | Unclear risk | No information provided |
Therapist/investigator allegiance | Unclear risk | No information provided |
Other bias | Unclear risk | No information provided |