Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 5;2018(7):CD011849. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011849.pub2

Igreja 2004.

Methods RCT
Participants Adult men or women who were Mozambican civil war survivors (Mozambique is characterised by almost 3 decades of war); born in the region; having survived the war while living within regional war zones. Former refugees or displaced persons from other regions were excluded
Age: mean 40 (SD 14) years
Interventions Testimony method: 66 participants
Control group: 71 participants
Outcomes Psychiatric morbidity was measured with the Self‐Report Questionnaire (SRQ); shocking experiences by a section of the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire (HTQ); prevalence of nightmares with the Nocturnal Intrusions after Traumatic Experiences questionnaire (NITE); and post‐traumatic stress symptoms with the Self‐Inventory for PTSD (SIFP)
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "During the baseline measurements, every participant was given a consecutive number. By using a cut‐off point in the measurements of post‐traumatic stress symptoms, the group was divided into a case (N=137) and a non‐case group (N=69). Depending on whether their number was an even or odd one, participants belonging to the case group were respectively assigned to an intervention group (N=66) or a control group (N=71)"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information provided
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No information provided
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Unclear who conducted assessments ‐ all by interview
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No information provided
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Not all of the study’s prespecified outcomes have been reported. No protocol available
Therapist qualification Low risk Intervention was delivered by a professional, in collaboration with 3 native speakers acting as interpreters
Treatment fidelity Unclear risk No information provided
Therapist/investigator allegiance Unclear risk No information provided
Other bias Unclear risk No information provided