Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 5;2018(7):CD011849. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011849.pub2

McMullen 2013.

Methods Parallel‐group study with a wait list control group and equal randomisation (1:1)
Participants The trial was conducted in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, which is thought to have approximately 30,000 children fighting or living with armed group
Inclusion criteria: male, younger than 18, either a former child soldier (abducted or recruited by an armed group) or a witness to a violent event involving a real or perceived direct threat to life. To keep the trial naturalistic, adolescents with suicidal ideation, substance abuse, or other mental health difficulties were not excluded
Interventions The intervention took place during May to July 2011 in Beni, a town in the North Kivu province. The city was affected by years of war, atrocities, and human rights violations against civilians
Trauma‐focused cognitive‐behavioural therapy (TF‐CBT): 25 participants
Wait list: 25 participants
Outcomes The UCLA‐PTSD‐RI was used to assess levels of post‐traumatic stress symptoms. The African Youth Psychosocial Assessment was used to measure levels of psychosocial distress
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "They were then randomly allocated, by the first author, to either TF‐CBT intervention group or wait‐list control group using a matched dyad sequence from a computer randomisation program (www.random.org) generated by the third author (off site)"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "To prevent selection bias, the first author was not present during assessment and did not meet the participants prior to the group allocation"
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk No information was provided, but it's hard to believe that blinding of participants could have been respected in such a study design
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "None of the interviewers participated in the intervention to ensure blinding of treatment allocation"
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Less than 20% of patients abandoned the study prematurely
Study endpoint: 1/25 missing from TF‐CBT group; 1/25 missing from WL group
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes are reported
Therapist qualification Low risk Interventon was delivered by 2 of the study authors (with PhD degree) and by 2 experienced Congolese counsellors through a local interpreter
Treatment fidelity Unclear risk Quote: "Daily training and evaluation sessions were held with these facilitators to ensure fidelity to the original intervention and to maximise cultural appropriateness"
No further information provided
Therapist/investigator allegiance Unclear risk Study authors were involved in translation/cultural adaptation of the intervention; in training staff in administering pre‐intervention interviews
Other bias Low risk Quote: "No external funding was provided for this study. This project was made possible through generous support from Queens University, colleagues, family and friends"