Choudhary 2012.
Methods |
Study design: randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial Study duration: not reported |
|
Participants |
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
|
|
Interventions |
Treatment group
Control group
Co‐interventions
|
|
Outcomes |
Primary
Secondary
|
|
Notes |
Funding source: not funded by any funding agency Other: microbiological and radiological diagnosis of pneumonia was not done. Serum vitamin D₃ level was not measured. Contact with study authors: email: 24 April 2016. Data were reported in median and IQR; we requested data in mean and SD, but this information was unavailable. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computer randomisation |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Sealed envelopes were used. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Blinding of participants and caretaker was ensured and unlikely that the blinding could have been broken, as both the intervention and placebo looked alike in terms of appearance, taste, and colour. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | The code key was opened only after the intervention, data collection, follow‐up, and tabulation were completed. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 4.5% (9/200) children lost to follow‐up or died |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | The trial was not registered, so this was unclear, but all outcomes proposed in the methods section were reported. |
Other bias | Low risk | No other known risks of bias |