Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 19;2018(7):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub4

LeBlanc 2015a.

Methods Study design: cluster‐randomized trial
 Unit of allocation: practice
 Unit of analysis: provider and patient
 Power calculation: done
Participants Care setting: primary care and ambulatory care, USA
 Health professionals: 117, various types (physician, nurse practitioner, physician assistant (see study protocol page 3)); fully trained and in training
 Patients: 301; depression; male and female
Interventions Single intervention: patient‐mediated intervention
 Quote: "Clinicians in the intervention group were to use the decision aid during the consultation with their patients..." page 1764
 
 Usual care (control):
 Quote: "...whereas clinicians in the control arm did not have access to the decision aid (usual care)." page 1764
Outcomes OPTION (continuous)
Notes Additional information
 Number of approached practices (eligible): not reported
 Number of patients per physician: 2, number of patients per practice: 34; number of clinician per practice: 7
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: insufficient information to make a judgement.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "The lead study statistician therefore stratified practices by their history of accrual and the presence of the DIAMOND [Depression Improvement Across Minnesota ‐ Offering New Direction]
 program (a practice redesign initiative to improve depression care present in numerous Minnesota practices at the time of the study), and centrally randomized practices within these strata to either care with or without Depression Medication Choice." page 1763
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Observer‐based outcome High risk Quote: "Study team members, practices, and clinicians were aware of the assigned arms." page 8
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 Observer‐based outcome Low risk Comment: "There was no difference in the attrition of participants or completeness of the data across arms (Figure 2)." page 11
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: The study protocol is available and all of the study’s pre‐specified (primary and secondary) outcomes that are of interest in the review have been reported in the pre‐specified way.
Other bias Low risk Comment: No evidence of other risk of biases.
Baseline measurement? 
 Observer‐based outcome Unclear risk Comment:No baseline measure of our primary outcome.
Protection against contamination? Low risk Comment: practices were randomized.
Baseline characteristics patients Low risk Comment: reported and similar (See table 1).
Baseline characteristics healthcare professionals Low risk Comment: reported and similar (See table 1).