Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 19;2018(7):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub4

van Veenendaal 2017.

Methods Study design not clear (we are not sure if there is a control group)
Participants Breast cancer patients
Interventions The introduction of time‐out periods and an participation in implementation program for SDM
  • ‘Time‐out’: an explicit time break between discussing diagnoses, treatment options and the eventual decision, allowing time for deliberation and reflection.

  • SDM in the consultations through applying four steps: (1) informing the patient that a treatment decision is to be made and that the patient's opinion is important; (2) discuss the treatment options and their pros and cons; (3) discuss the patient's preferences and support the patient in deliberation; (4) discuss the patient’s wish to make or defer the decision, and discuss follow‐up.


The hospitals participated in a tailor‐made implementation program consisting of:
  • Feedback on the performance regarding SDM and time‐out, using the OPTION‐5 instrument and SDM‐Q‐9 questionnaire, and on the barriers and facilitators for implementation.

  • Participation of hospital teams in four collaborative training sessions aiming at process redesign, applying SDM, time‐out, and tools for SDM.

  • A local team training on applying SDM and time‐out in consultations

  • Support for the application of tools, such as decision aids, that enhance SDM.

Outcomes Involvement of breast cancer patients in decision‐making (OPTION5, SDM‐Q9)
Notes  

OPTION: Observing patient involvement; SDM: Shared decision making; SDM‐Q9: Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (9‐item)