Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 18;2018(7):CD003177. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003177.pub3
Methods RCT, parallel, (n‐3 EPA + DHA vs n‐6 LA), 12 months
Summary risk of bias: low
Participants Participants with non‐cirrhotic NASH (non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis)
N: 20 intervention, 21 control (analysed 17 intervention, 17 control)
Level of risk for CVD: moderate
Men: 35.3% intervention, 41.2% control
Mean age in years (SD): 46.4 (12.1) intervention, 47.2 (12) control
Age range: 25‐72 years
Smokers: not reported
Hypertension: not reported
Medications taken by at least 50% of those in the control group: not reported
Medications taken by 20%‐49% of those in the control group: not reported
Medications taken by some, but less than 20% of the control group: not reported
Location: USA
Ethnicity: intervention, 100% white, control 94.% white, 5.9% other
Interventions Type: supplement (capsule)
Comparison: EPA + DHA vs omega 6
Intervention: 3 × 1 g fish oil capsules/d (Nordic Natural) for a total 2.1 g/d n‐3, each capsule contained 70% of n‐3 (1050 mg EPA, 750 mg DHA + 300 mg other n‐3). Dose: 1.8 g/d EPA + DHA
Control: 3 × 1 g identical placebo (soybean) capsules per day containing 8% fish oils
Both groups had dietary counselling on caloric intake and physical activity
Compliance: unclear (measured n‐6‐n‐3 ratio due to its link to hepatic lipid composition)
Length of intervention: 12 months
Outcomes Main study outcome: NASH activity score
Dropouts: 3 intervention, 3 control
Available outcomes: lipids (TG too unbalanced at baseline to use), measures of adiposity (weight, BMI, visceral fat – all unbalanced at baseline so not used), fasting glucose, insulin, HOMA‐IR, QUICKI (also NASH progression, hepatic fat, ALT, VO2 max, activity level, markers of cell injury, adiponectin not used)
Response to contact: yes, change data supplied for BMI and body weight, confirmed no deaths, cardiovascular events, diabetes, depression, breast cancer or IBD diagnoses
Notes Data on; BMI, weight, visceral fat, TG and glucose were not used as they were different between groups at baseline.
Study funding: study was supported by NIH NCCAM Grant 5R21AT2901–2 and 5 M01 RR00847. Study medication and identical appearing placebo was provided at no charge by Nordic Natural. RBC phospholipid profile was performed by Metametrix (www.metametrix.com). M30, M65, adiponectin, and IGFBP‐1 electro chemiluminescence assays were performed by Wellstat Diagnostics (www.wellstatdiagnostics.com).
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Participants were randomised to n‐3 or placebo using a stratified block 1:1 randomisation scheme. An independent biostatistician generated the randomisation list which was confidentially forwarded to the Investigational pharmacy
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk As above
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes Low risk All staff and subjects were blinded to therapy assignment throughout the study period. Both capsules were identical. However no information provided on capsules taste or smell
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes Low risk Blinded for main outcome
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Low risk 15% dropouts explained and equal in both groups
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk The trial was prospectively registered
Attention Low risk Both groups had the same attention
Compliance Unclear risk No details on compliance measurement
Other bias Low risk None noted