Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 1;2018(9):CD012841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012841.pub2

Ahmad 2015.

Methods Prospective cohort study
Setting: hospital leg ulcer clinic
Country: UK
Duration of follow‐up: 6 months
Treatments: compression bandaging (3‐layer or 4‐layer)
Participants 30 participants with VLUs (recalcitrant ulcers)
Median age (range): 62 (36‐79) years vs 70 (40‐92) years (healed vs non‐healed)
Sex (M:F): 4:5 vs 10:11 (healed vs non‐healed)
Stage of ulcer: not reported
Ulcer duration: median (range): 12 (3‐84) months vs 19 (2‐180) months (healed vs non‐healed)
Ulcer size at baseline: median (range): 6 (2‐165) cm² vs 9 (3‐140) cm² (healed vs non‐healed)
Wound infection: not reported
Number of wounds: 30 (if bilateral, only 1 limb assessed)
Inclusion criteria: confirmed VLU; incompetence of superficial veins or thrombosed deep veins on duplex scan
Exclusion criteria: ABPI < 0.8, immunosuppressed, unable to tolerate compression therapy
Prognostic factors Active uPA (continuous data); total uPA (including receptor bound and complexed to PAI‐1 and PAI‐2). Level of active uPA (quote: "below sensitivity of bioimmunoassay"). Measurement method ELISA: total uPA antigen measurements by ELISA IMUBIND (American Diagnostica). Active uPA measured by bioimmunoassay with the WHO uPA standard. Activity and antigen measurements normalised against soluble protein concentration (Coomassie Plus protein assay).
Time of measurement: collected before start of compression therapy
Wound fluid sampling method: occlusive dressings (exudate collected from under Opsite (Smith & Nephew) dressing)
Notes uPA activity measured too, but in all ulcer exudates the level was below the sensitivity of the bioimmunoassay.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Selection bias Unclear risk Moderate: unclear if consecutive participants, but representative; people at a dedicated ulcer clinic (but inclusion criterion for review was any with VLU).
Attrition bias Low risk No missing data
Prognostic factor measurement High risk Inappropriate biomarker measure: ELISA for total uPA (including bound and complexed uPA); active bioimmunoassay with uPA WHO standard. Activity below sensitivity level
Outcome measurement Unclear risk Moderate: unclear if blinded; defined as complete re‐epithelialisation after 6 months
Adjustment factors High risk None of the key adjustment factors taken into account in the design or analysis
Analysis and reporting High risk Results reported only for total uPA
Overall risk of bias High risk