Mwaura 2006.
Methods | Prospective cohort Setting: hospital venous unit Country: Ireland Duration of follow‐up: 8 weeks Treatments: Profore (Smith & Nephew) graduated compression bandaging |
|
Participants | 40 participants with VLUs Mean age: 60 years Sex (M:F): 11:29 Stage of ulcer: CEAP stage 6 Ulcer duration: not reported Ulcer size at baseline: not reported Wound infection: not reported Number of wounds: 40 Inclusion criteria: aged ≥ 50 years, VLU duration ≥ 8 weeks, ABPI > 0.9 Exclusion criteria: deep venous reflux, history of DVT, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes, use of steroids, immunosuppression, chronic renal or liver disease, smoker |
|
Prognostic factors | MMP‐2 (continuous data); ng/mL. Measurement method ELISA: R&D kit, immunoassay with optical density measurements Time of measurement: baseline Wound fluid sampling method: entrapment in dressings (wound fluid extracted from non‐adherent dressing that was in place for < 36 hours before clinic attendance) |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Selection bias | Unclear risk | Moderate: participants attending the venous unit were recruited; no further details. Unclear whether representative |
Attrition bias | Low risk | No missing data |
Prognostic factor measurement | Unclear risk | Moderate: wound fluid extracted from dressings used for treatment; unclear if this is reasonable |
Outcome measurement | Unclear risk | Moderate: unclear if blinded |
Adjustment factors | High risk | None of the key adjustment factors taken into account in the design or analysis |
Analysis and reporting | Low risk | |
Overall risk of bias | Unclear risk | Moderate overall |