Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 1;2018(9):CD012841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012841.pub2

Mwaura 2006.

Methods Prospective cohort
Setting: hospital venous unit
Country: Ireland
Duration of follow‐up: 8 weeks
Treatments: Profore (Smith & Nephew) graduated compression bandaging
Participants 40 participants with VLUs
Mean age: 60 years
Sex (M:F): 11:29
Stage of ulcer: CEAP stage 6
Ulcer duration: not reported
Ulcer size at baseline: not reported
Wound infection: not reported
Number of wounds: 40
Inclusion criteria: aged ≥ 50 years, VLU duration ≥ 8 weeks, ABPI > 0.9
Exclusion criteria: deep venous reflux, history of DVT, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes, use of steroids, immunosuppression, chronic renal or liver disease, smoker
Prognostic factors MMP‐2 (continuous data); ng/mL. Measurement method ELISA: R&D kit, immunoassay with optical density measurements
Time of measurement: baseline
Wound fluid sampling method: entrapment in dressings (wound fluid extracted from non‐adherent dressing that was in place for < 36 hours before clinic attendance)
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Selection bias Unclear risk Moderate: participants attending the venous unit were recruited; no further details. Unclear whether representative
Attrition bias Low risk No missing data
Prognostic factor measurement Unclear risk Moderate: wound fluid extracted from dressings used for treatment; unclear if this is reasonable
Outcome measurement Unclear risk Moderate: unclear if blinded
Adjustment factors High risk None of the key adjustment factors taken into account in the design or analysis
Analysis and reporting Low risk  
Overall risk of bias Unclear risk Moderate overall